I'm a recent convert* to limiting executive pay as a multiple of worker pay.

But it also showed that so far many businesses were not increasing worker pay.

Increases in healthcare premiums reduce worker pay.

When worker pay grows faster than worker productivity, costs rise, profits are squeezed, and prices start to increase more quickly.

Neither tenure has been without its rough spots, including disputes over issues like worker pay, new buildings, ethnic studies and animal rights.

Most significant, worker pay is falling behind inflation.

However, due to low worker pay, participant pools are skewed towards poor users in developing countries.

Economists fall into two camps when it comes to worker pay.

Could it be that cost-plus contracts, which lead to increased profit when costs rise, have something to do with their sudden interest in worker pay?