But with my hypothesis we need only Adelmo, his decision, and a shift of some land.

It indicates the compatibility of the evidence with the given hypothesis.

For example, if you're testing whether a thing works, and starting with the null hypothesis that it won't work.

You start with the null hypothesis that they are all the same.

Additional analysis was consistent with the hypothesis of self replication.

It should be noted that these in vitro results are contrast with the hypothesis mentioned above.

So I came up with my own hypothesis.

The main problem with their hypothesis is, of course, that it is hard to finesse my being left for dead.

As values of F increase above 1 the evidence is increasingly inconsistent with the null hypothesis.

That did pretty much agree with Big Tom's hypothesis.