It's both a confluence and a conflict between immediate financial resources and the channels of influence through which those resources must flow.

Even though they are smaller, each has the overhead of an "installation;" obtaining and maintaining a suitable path over which the resource can flow.

For actual resources flowing to the customer, like gas or water, the proportional cost dominates.

Private resources will flow to potential profit centers without public participation in ethical decisions.

When the resources were flowing relatively freely - there's never enough - faculty salaries and expenditures on academic programs grew faster than the administration grew.

The old channels through which the relevant resources flowed have dried up or been dug up.

It is expected national resources would flow more favourably to provinces which have local governments related to the ruling political figures.

All the rules must be followed, but my plea here would be that we also help to ensure that in the end resources actually can flow.

Yes, we need extra, additional resources for those Member States that are principally affected, I would say, by the increased migration flows that we are seeing today.

With politicians vying to declare a renewed "war on drugs," there is a danger that resources will flow disproportionately into interdiction and police work to interrupt the supply of drugs.