I don't think there are any concerns about replacement players.

And they won't care what it costs, or how many games are played by replacement players.

It would be too late to bring in replacement players on such short notice.

The 1987 season brought a month long strike that included the use of replacement players for three games.

The games for weeks 4-6 were won with all replacement players.

Three games of the Packers' season were played with replacement players, going 2-1.

"To go get replacement players is not the right thing to do."

He also spoke about giving the replacement players "a party or a special dinner."

The Eagles lost all 3 games played with replacement players.

When you think about it, why not watch replacement players?