I wonder if he feels that they should teach a manufactured scientific controversy over evolution too?

The Galileo affair and the conflict over evolution are prime examples.

At the time, news of Kansas' decision echoed across the country, particularly in states that had dealt with the fight over creationism and evolution.

The fight over evolution has reached the big, big screen.

The petition, they say, is proof that scientific doubt over evolution persists.

There are finitely many sites, and so over evolution, a single site can be changed multiple times.

Kansas is the latest state to face a battle over evolution and creationism in recent years.

Mainstream scientists reject the notion that any controversy over evolution even exists.

Is he calling for the schools to "teach the controversy" over evolution vs. "intelligent design"?

It's like the debate over evolution all over again.