The dissenting opinion noted that Mr. Abbott's rights are limited to visitation and the right to restrict the child's travel outside of Chile.

The opinion simply noted that it was unclear exactly what the state court ruling was based on, without making clear itself what the consequences would be either way.

In its constitutional analysis, the opinion noted that the Constitution did not explicitly mention a right to privacy.

Another former director, Saul S. Sherman, settled the case for $2 million last year, without acknowledging wrongdoing, the opinion noted.

The unanimous opinion by Justice Harlan noted two issues in the case.

Separate opinions, concurring or dissenting, are noted, but not described.

But the opinion noted that some clubs might have a right to discriminate in some cases, including if members do not use a club for business or professional purposes.

The court's opinion noted concerns over conflicts of interest from research and investment banking operating under one roof.

Justice Scalia's opinion noted that "no one doubts" Congressional authority to address "actual violations" of the 14th Amendment.

The opinion noted that the government said on Nov. 5 that it had detained 1,182 people in connection with the Sept. 11 investigation.