Some have argued that ballots should not be manually counted because there is no objective criterion for determining the effects of human error.

The piles are then counted manually, while witnesses around the table observe.

However, if counted manually the process could - according to London Elects - take up to 3 days.

In villages, the ballots are even counted manually.

If only selected precincts or counties are manually counted, the hand count, assuming it is more accurate, may help the candidate favored in those areas.

The second issue with respect to Miami-Dade are the approximately 9,000 votes that have never been manually counted even once.

Or at least all of the votes were manually counted.

I got from reading somewhere that what we're defining or what's being argued here as an undervote is, are ballots which have not been manually counted.

The records can be manually counted and compared to the electronic vote totals in the event of a dispute.

If the receipt is retained, the receipts can be manually counted and compared to the electronic vote totals in the event of a dispute.