The interpretation given by the Court to language rights was expansive in four respects:

Their demands included language rights and the provision for a degree of political autonomy.

The more moderate Government bill would continue some language rights for minorities.

It championed language rights and also reflected the interests of Nepalese business.

While in Ontario, there is a developed policy of statutory (not constitutional) minority language rights.

Working for the sign language community means we can include all these people in our campaigns for language rights.

It doesn't give language rights to the people of Wales in every aspect of their lives.

The goal is to bring attention the issue of language rights back to the international agenda.

This also makes it more extensive than language rights in the Constitution Act, 1867.

This controversy was largely resolved after 1896, and French language rights were restored in the 1980s.