Section 215 was amended further regardless so as to give greater judicial oversight and review.

They already are pulling sites down and keeping them (without any judicial oversight) so why do we need this?

Such a system has huge potential for abuse, which is why judicial oversight has always been important.

In many states, such restrictions are mandated by law, though often with the right of judicial oversight.

He has, rather, called for a greater level of judicial oversight.

People shouldn't be banned from the internet even with judicial oversight.

It would also add new safeguards, including some provisions for judicial oversight.

And let us certainly demand judicial oversight for their steps.

This practice is carried out in the absence of judicial oversight.

Would there be judicial oversight or a method of appeal?