According to the picture in the article he looks good.

Some good points are made in the article, but I just can't see how anything is going to change.

I am sure the guy in the article was talking about something similar.

In an article about science, you don't think those things are important?

An example of this will be given later in the article.

Also as was said in the article, it doesn't make any economic sense.

I'm not going to be able to use it in the article.

Or is there something else here not in the article?

This is the point we were making in the article.

However, two points in the article are cause for concern.