The notion that the summary trial and quick execution had violated legal norms and civil rights was beyond the concern of the men.

The delay clears the way for the Supreme Court to hear the man's claim that the execution would violate his constitutional rights simply because he is innocent.

The Supreme Court ruled in 1989 that such executions did not violate the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment.

In other words, some possible executions of the code will violate a specification on the modeling level.

The court ruled that the execution of the mentally retarded does not violate the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishments.

They said the execution would violate the Eighth Amendment prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment.

The Court held that where police reasonably believe their warrant was valid during a search, execution of the warrant does not violate respondent's Fourth Amendment rights.

The Supreme Court will be asked today to decide "whether the execution of mentally retarded individuals convicted of capital crimes violates the Eighth Amendment."

Defence lawyers have argued that Yong's execution violates human rights and the separation of powers in government.

The Supreme Court ruled in 1989 that the execution of someone who had killed at age 16 did not violate the Constitution.