They have a desktop OS and they have touch layer.

There's no reason to think either will move to a closed desktop OS.

The first is that fully automatic memory management will eventually be an expected feature of the primary application development environment for a desktop OS.

It had a number of attributes that are still unique in a desktop OS.

Despite all advances of Linux it doesn't seem to be able to become a good desktop OS.

I'm not seeing a problem with some form of Windows - it doesn't need to be a full-blown desktop OS.

Apple's desktop OS is on its way out any day now!

On a desktop OS without sandboxing, this vulnerability is much more severe.

Linux isn't a great desktop OS yet but on phones it has serious potential.

Right now, there is a mistaken belief that Linux will never be a desktop OS.