When a review is read by a member, the author gets money added to their account.

The author is getting better, and the second book should have more value, but that's not the way they look at it.

"The danger is they are determined not to let the author get away from them."

If the author ever got inside his building, there's little to show for it.

But he also said that the authors got a lot right.

The authors get a great idea, and then they say, 'What if?

The question, as one goes along, is how the author can get his terrorists out of the fix they have got themselves into.

Or the author of this article screwed up and got the data wrong.

The local Mafia is also involved, because the author just can't get enough of these guys.

So the author gets to imply something without actually providing any evidence.