A deductive argument asserts that the truth of the conclusion is a logical consequence of the premises.

An inductive argument, on the other hand, asserts that the truth of the conclusion is otherwise supported by the premises.

His argument further asserted that Muhammad being illiterate also disqualified him from being a prophet.

Taken to their logical conclusions, these arguments assert that inner-city schools are doing the best they can with what they are given.

The teleological argument asserts the view that things without intelligence are ordered towards a purpose.

This argument asserts that an organized movement among the vast multitude is both undesirable and impossible.

This argument asserts that the administration may have powers even broader than those acknowledged by the courts in wartime cases throughout American history.

A misuse of statistics occurs when a statistical argument asserts a falsehood.

Of course, the argument doesn't assert that the two things are identical, only that they are similar.

The first argument simply asserts that social factors outweigh individual ones.