In his line of work one question always led to another.

One or two questions might even lead to a real conversation.

Science is like that, one question often leads to another.

This was not the impression he wanted to give, but then anyone could see where his questions were leading.

This question will lead to an answer that both sides can accept.

In 1923, the question of international affiliation led to a split.

I feel like every question just leads away from the real answer to all of this.

Other questions may lead on to further enquiry and research.

These questions eventually lead students to generating a conclusion based on the data.

Direct questions lead to one word answers when explanations are sometimes needed.