Under the Court's Fourth Amendment jurisprudence, a traffic stop is a "seizure," and requires reasonable suspicion that the driver of the vehicle has violated a traffic law.

As a part of this conference, the center invites some legal scholars to present papers on emerging issues in Fourth Amendment jurisprudence.

A threshold question in Fourth Amendment jurisprudence is whether a search has occurred.

His primary interests involve constitutional law, especially First Amendment jurisprudence, and legal philosophy.

The permissibility of ordinary visual surveillance of a home used to be clear because, well into the 20th century, our Fourth Amendment jurisprudence was tied to common-law trespass.

There is no need for the court to craft a new rule to decide this case, as it is controlled by established principles from our Fourth Amendment jurisprudence.

Fourth Amendment jurisprudence has traditionally distinguished between protected "content" and constitutionally unprotected "non-content" information about communications.

During his tenure, he made, among other areas, major contributions to criminal justice reform, civil rights, access to the courts, and Fourth Amendment jurisprudence.

It is based upon Fourteenth Amendment jurisprudence, and has historical antecedents dating back to ancient Greece.

By the time of Opperman, a distinction had emerged in Fourth Amendment jurisprudence between searches of the home and searches of automobiles.