Finally, do we really want a new entitlement program based on age?

The rest would have to be taken from entitlement programs.

So many kids these days have such a sense of entitlement.

And many would be expected to under the new health entitlement program.

Entitlement has nothing to do with what's right, in this case.

"How many more entitlement programs do we want to put on the books?"

And some will have to be cut, entitlements among them.

Of course, we have to hold down the growth in entitlement spending.

The entitlement to these services is common to all citizens.

This can generally only be done once as a matter of entitlement.

"Do I really want my children to grow up with a sense of entitlement?"

"Why run for office if you are not going to try something like entitlement reform?"

Never mind the conference on entitlements, as many of them have said.

Which means we have no choice but to cut entitlements.

It takes some years for the sense of entitlement to wear off.

An even better answer would be for Congress to cut specific entitlement programs directly.

No part of your entitlement can be carried forward from one year to the next.

Entitlement programs, as they are known, now account for more than a third of the Federal budget.

"People who go into special events with a sense of entitlement find out quickly that it's not true."

Why not give people a post-16 entitlement to the equivalent of 2 years' free education to be taken at any point during their life?

These people with their sense of entitlement are just gross.

Not that a sense of entitlement is unique to them in politics.

Women these days seem to have a profound sense of entitlement.

For the past 30 years, Americans have wanted high entitlement spending and low taxes.

America needs less, he declares, in the way of entitlement from the Government.

Finally, do we really want a new entitlement program based on age?

The rest would have to be taken from entitlement programs.

And many would be expected to under the new health entitlement program.

"How many more entitlement programs do we want to put on the books?"

An even better answer would be for Congress to cut specific entitlement programs directly.

Entitlement programs, as they are known, now account for more than a third of the Federal budget.

Conservatives say the Bush administration has not done much to cut the growth of federal entitlement programs.

In these difficult economic times a lot of senior entitlement programs are going to be attacked.

And what's most alarming to me is the growth rate of these new entitlement programs.

The talks today centered on what are called entitlement programs.

They should have enough sense not to say "entitlement programs" when they're talking about is, precisely, social insurance.

The first wave is the exploding cost of the entitlement programs.

In addition to the new government entitlement programs, the percentage of Americans with private insurance rose.

That is a crisis, but it has nothing to do with entitlement programs for the elderly.

Entitlement programs, we are told, represent the third rail of American politics.

"And I don't mean just in terms of entitlement programs or more laws."

They are called entitlement programs, a name that accurately reflects what people feel about them.

In addition, she said, many of the less affluent schools receive money through federal entitlement programs.

Somehow we have to pay for this and the big money to cut is in the entitlement programs."

Instead the Republicans want to end the 60-year-old entitlement program and provide block grants to the states.

"You want to stress natural consequences with money - and that there is no entitlement program in life."

This increase further strained schools, welfare, public health and other entitlement programs.

As an entitlement program, Medicaid expands to meet the need in hard economic times.

"And the best way to achieve that is to create a new middle-class entitlement program."

The debate has been growing in recent months at the local and national levels about whether welfare should remain an entitlement program.

Finally, do we really want a new entitlement program based on age?

The rest would have to be taken from entitlement programs.

So many kids these days have such a sense of entitlement.

And many would be expected to under the new health entitlement program.

Entitlement has nothing to do with what's right, in this case.

"How many more entitlement programs do we want to put on the books?"

And some will have to be cut, entitlements among them.

Of course, we have to hold down the growth in entitlement spending.

The entitlement to these services is common to all citizens.

This can generally only be done once as a matter of entitlement.

"Do I really want my children to grow up with a sense of entitlement?"

"Why run for office if you are not going to try something like entitlement reform?"

Never mind the conference on entitlements, as many of them have said.

Which means we have no choice but to cut entitlements.

It takes some years for the sense of entitlement to wear off.

An even better answer would be for Congress to cut specific entitlement programs directly.

No part of your entitlement can be carried forward from one year to the next.

Entitlement programs, as they are known, now account for more than a third of the Federal budget.

"People who go into special events with a sense of entitlement find out quickly that it's not true."

Why not give people a post-16 entitlement to the equivalent of 2 years' free education to be taken at any point during their life?

These people with their sense of entitlement are just gross.

Not that a sense of entitlement is unique to them in politics.

Women these days seem to have a profound sense of entitlement.

For the past 30 years, Americans have wanted high entitlement spending and low taxes.

America needs less, he declares, in the way of entitlement from the Government.